A lot people have been wondering what the difference is between Biopunk and Steampunk. The biopunk definition is this. Although it’s been covered before, biopunk has been called sub-genre of science fiction focused on biology and biotechnology. It is the result of cyberpunk but focuses on the suggestions of biology and biotechnology slightly more than information technology. Biopunk concerns and is involved in synthetic biology. It is derived from cyberpunk with hackers(and for that matter bio hacking), mega-biotechnology companies and oppressive government agencies that manipulate human DNA.

Biopunk usually explores the dark atmosphere of cyberpunk and generally examines the dark side of genetic engineering and represents the basis of biotechnology. The common interests and ideas of this sub-genre are biotechnologies in the context of the gap between the rich and the poor. The biopunk definition also includes the value and nature of life and humanity, human improvement. Finally it involves the abuse of biotechnology for social control and profit.


After the socio-political practices around biopunk are organized, as well as the literary and historical relations from whom it comes, there may be a brief intervention at this time. But since punk itself is a protean sample of variant definitions, some generic elements naturally resonate even in biopunk. As noted above, the biopunk movement is anti-capitalist and anti-regional and writers sometimes still feel angry for their stories.

The origin and Biopunk Definition

In his SF Brave New Words, Jeff Prucher Dictionary gives a biopunk definition. It is etymologically derived from the word “biology + cyberpunk” in the sense of “a sub-genre of science fiction that explores, according to him, the social impact of biotechnology and genetic engineering “. Then calls the GURPS-role the first use of the term in 1992, his second quote in Interzone 54/1 in 1997. Next it gives the strong connection that etymology describes and neglects his own definition: “The agents described cyberpunk enhance positive body by implants of mechanical chips or silicon; Biopunk examines a more fundamental consumerist option, where not only our bodies but our cells are changed “apart from the dubious opposition between” body “and” cells “, meaning use term biokop not only a subgenre of science fiction, but a subgenre of cyberpunk, a variation on the themes and tropes of the famous science fiction subgenre itself.

Other Examples of Biopunk

Prucher neglected not only the relationship between biokoppel and cyberpunk but also the most likely currencies Brian McHale in his book Constitution postmodernism in 1992. In his last chapter, “A Poetics of Cyberpunk,” McHale Cyberpunk does not identify as a literary movement or cultural object, but as a literary mode whose poetics can be described in “three great bundles or complexes of motifs: death, both individually and collectively,” “worldliness,” zelfcentrifugaal “and McHale under the number Complexe 2 identifies the cyberpunk tendency to cope with “dispersion and dесеntrаlіzаtіоn” оf self bу сrеаtіng vіѕіоnѕ оf a vаrіеtу of роѕt-humаn futurеѕ. Here, Thomas Foster cyberpunk identifies the strongest as an intervention and looks at an existing discourse on the posthuman, a popular cultural path for the various concepts inherent to it.

To understand the Cyberpunk of historical biopunk debt (and thus the prototypical elements of its cultural education), a deeper analysis of McHale’s differentiation can be justified. He proposes to use a “useful taxonomy” of possible post-human representations in cyberpunk science fiction by Bruce Sterling’s Schismatrix story cycle to identify its extreme positions. In Schismatrix, two post-gay groups compete for power, Shapers, and Mechanists. The mechanisms’ use of electronic and bio-mechanical means to perfect themselves’, while shapers’ use Klonechnieken biological techniques, genetic engineering to achieve the same goals. ”